From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:18:03 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] v2 Add UBI image generation support. In-Reply-To: <1292953087-19486-1-git-send-email-julien.boibessot@free.fr> References: <1292953087-19486-1-git-send-email-julien.boibessot@free.fr> Message-ID: <20101225121803.16bc81c6@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 18:38:07 +0100 julien.boibessot at free.fr wrote: > From: Julien Boibessot > > UBI images are generated from UBIFS one (with ubinize tool) and are used by > bootloaders (eg U-Boot) to write UBIFS images directly on bare NAND FLASH > (see http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubi.html). > > Changes since v1: > * change some comments/helps > * as requested by Thomas, merged fs/ubi/ in fs/ubifs/, but kept ubifs.mk and > ubi.mk separated. (I don't know if it's really worth to merge them...) > > Signed-off-by: Julien Boibessot > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Colombain After thinking about this a bit, I think having two separate images is better, as it is more clear for the user what the image actually is. Therefore, I think this version from Julien should be applied, and it gets my: Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com