From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:28:50 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] fontconfig: bump to version 2.8.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110114092850.1fb27fc1@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Matt, On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:12:09 -0700 Matt Johnson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Matt Johnson > --- > ...fontconfig-2.6.0-parallel-compilation-fix.patch | 26 ------- In the commit description, would be great to say that the parallel-compilation-fix patch is no longer necessary since it has been merged upstream at http://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/commit/?id=0e21b5a4d5609a5dd0f332b412d878b6f1037d29 so that people reviewing your patch can easily understand why it's no longer necessary. > .../fontconfig-2.6.0-use_for_build.patch | 80 -------------------- > .../fontconfig-2.8.0-use_for_build.patch | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++ A patch has been committed upstream that intends to fix some cross-compilation issues: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/commit/?id=2a6b235ff6d2750171e8dff7cfdfe3bccb0f630e but it is not part of fontconfig-2.8.0. Does it solve all problems fixed by the use_for_build patch ? If so, I'd prefer to see an already upstreamed patch used in Buildroot, with the proper comment mentionning that the next version of fontconfig will include this fix. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com