From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 09:09:29 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] RFC: toolchain wrapper for external toolchains In-Reply-To: <87r589j6c6.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <1304433655-1629-1-git-send-email-jacmet@sunsite.dk> <20110508190135.0b9df312@surf> <87r589j6c6.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20110509090929.1060775e@surf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 08 May 2011 22:16:41 +0200 Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Thomas> Moreover, it has been committed only two days after the > Thomas> proposal, a duration which is very short for the other > Thomas> contributors to take the time to test the patches and give > Thomas> their opinion. This is also very short compared to the amount > Thomas> of time many other contributions have been waiting for being > Thomas> merged. For example, have a look at the patch set I > Thomas> contributed on April, 2nd > Thomas> (http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2011-April/042309.html), > Thomas> which is also something that has been discussed during the > Thomas> FOSDEM meeting. > > Yes. The config option rename is naturally massively intrusive, so I > didn't want to rush to apply it (E.G. see the recent discussion about > differing between what the toolchain has for ext toolchains and what > we want to enable - E.G. ipv6 support) Yes, I indeed understand that this patch set is intrusive :-) > Thomas> In the future, would it be possible to leave more time > Thomas> between post and commit, for such major infrastructure > Thomas> changes ? > > Sure. Thanks a lot. I strongly appreciate that it is possible to have this kind of open discussion on the development process without entering any sort of aggression or fight. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com