From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 22:46:42 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] new package: libav In-Reply-To: <0LvAri-1Rcapv3sjy-010LQJ@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> References: <0LvAri-1Rcapv3sjy-010LQJ@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> Message-ID: <20110705224642.4953b847@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Wolfram, Thanks for your patches! Le Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:27:13 +0200, Wolfram Gloger a ?crit : > This is a copy of the ffmpeg package with the names and download > changed for libav-0.7. > > Why choose this fork when there is "original" ffmpeg? > > - It may be the future? I don't know, but for sure it was dreadfully > hard to get patches into ffmpeg. > > - I found that ffmpeg (at least 0.6.3) does _not_ work with minidlna > (buildroot patch forthcoming), there are strange hangups just > calling av_stream_info() on many ts files. > libav worked out of the box in this context. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Gloger Could you turn this into a proper commit log message ? Could you also send your patch inline and not as an attached file ? This make it easier to review and comment. If the libav package is a copy of the ffmpeg one, isn't it possible to share the same .mk file ? We could then make them separate when/if libav diverges from ffmpeg in a significant way. What do you think ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com