From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:03:05 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] Add support for package-declared devices In-Reply-To: <4E64F592.8080209@free-electrons.com> References: <20110905085210.705e63a0@skate> <4E64F592.8080209@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <201109061803.05970.arnout@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Monday 05 September 2011 18:15:14, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/09/2011 08:52, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Le Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:36:43 +0200, > > > > Arnout Vandecappelle a ?crit : > >> Good idea! This will also make it possible to create setuid > >> executables. > > > > Yes, exactly. However, I don't really like the name _DEVICE_TABLE > > because, it might be for other purposes as well (setting setuid bit, > > giving specific owner/group or permissions, etc.). Does anyone has an > > idea for a better name? > > I agree, I don't like it neither, but I have no idea on what could be > better... > > Files, maybe, but I find it way too generic. How about _FILE_MOD_TABLE (cfr. chmod)? BTW, BR2_ROOTFS_DEVICE_TABLE the device_table.txt files should change in the same way. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 31BB CF53 8660 6F88 345D 54CC A836 5879 20D7 CF43