From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:51:22 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] Report from the Buildroot Developer Day In-Reply-To: References: <20111102160349.4afe5935@skate> Message-ID: <201111181751.22578.arnout@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Friday 18 November 2011 11:04:58 Bj?rn Forsman wrote: > Thomas P. had some concerns about the patch not handling staging-dir > and I never got around fixing that. > > Should I resubmit even if the patch doesn't address the staging-dir issue? I consider clean-staging less important than clean-target. Having things lingering around in staging is usually not a problem, except for the presence of some header or .pc of a library that is no longer present. Normally buildroot should disable old that in the configure step, but of course you can never be sure. To implement a clean-staging, we'll probably need to use the copy-to-staging step of the external toolchains for all toolchains. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 31BB CF53 8660 6F88 345D 54CC A836 5879 20D7 CF43