From: Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Real time Linux implementation
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 05:24:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201112030524.28230.minimod@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111203120816.4c0f862a@skate>
On Sat December 3 2011, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Will the project need a general policy of just how "strange and unusual"
> > will be considered for inclusion in the build system?
> >
> > My reason for posing this question early in the life-time of the
> > "kernel extensions" feature is the on-going maintenace chore of
> > these specializations.
>
> For all these kernel extensions, Buildroot does not even try to make
> sure that the kernel selected by the user is compatible with the kernel
> extension that was enabled. We leave that work to the user, simply
> because it is impossible to keep track of which kernel extension
> supports which kernel version on which architecture.
>
> I think that Buildroot is merely a tool to automate the build process
> of an embedded Linux system. It doesn't, and it will never, replace the
> engineer that makes decision on using Xenomai version X, knowing that
> it supports the kernel version Y that he is using on his embedded
> device. Buildroot only helps here by making the build process
> automated, *once* the engineer has made the right choices in terms of
> versions (kernel version and kernel extension version).
>
Sounds like a policy statement to me.
Buildroot != Automated engineering
Maybe even distill that down to a (polite) "user is on their own here"
comment at the head of the kernel extensions menu branch.
;-)
Since BR does provide a great degree of build automation, a new user
might just assume that it is also fully checking package compatability.
(It doesn't and I agree that it shouldn't - different job.)
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-03 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 19:27 [Buildroot] Real time Linux implementation Morten Jensen
2011-12-01 21:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-12-02 18:33 ` Stephan Hoffmann
2011-12-02 23:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-12-03 10:53 ` Michael S. Zick
2011-12-03 11:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-12-03 11:24 ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2011-12-07 8:34 ` Julien Boibessot
2011-12-09 18:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201112030524.28230.minimod@morethan.org \
--to=minimod@morethan.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox