From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 13:03:41 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Pre-RFC: clean integration of unclean packages In-Reply-To: References: <201112051046.38674.arnout@mind.be> <201112051108.12890.arnout@mind.be> Message-ID: <201112051303.41429.arnout@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Monday 05 December 2011 12:13:48 Thomas De Schampheleire wrote: > > Note that the same Makefile.ti is used for all ti packages. > > Could you gives us an idea of the contents of this file? > Depending on its contents, this may be problematic: what if you update > only one of the ti packages and it became incompatible with the > existing Makefile.ti? > But, if this Makefile.ti file is sufficiently general, I wouldn't be > opposed to this principle. My Makefile.ti is currently still in flux. If you change or add a TI package, it may be necessary to modify Makefile.ti as well. That's how I'm working now. It should be possible to keep it compatible with the existing use cases. > What if someone would really like the full xdctools for some reason? > I think it'd be better to rename your package to something more > specific, like xdctools-dep, or otherwise to have just one package but > with two targets (with a different name, of course). Good point, I'll do that. Thank you for all your feedback! Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 31BB CF53 8660 6F88 345D 54CC A836 5879 20D7 CF43