From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:46:18 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/5] faad2: fix broken build with binutils 2.22+ In-Reply-To: <1323617160-4360-3-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1323617160-4360-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <1323617160-4360-3-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20111211174618.109ec5a6@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:25:58 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias a ?crit : > +FAAD2_CONF_ENV = LIBS="-lm" Instead of this, wouldn't it be better to carry a patch against the package that makes the necessary modification ? I think a patch has more chance to get removed appropriately when a new upstream version that fixes the problem has been released. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com