From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:39:03 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] lpc32xx: Add CDL to the available bootloaders In-Reply-To: <1325675997.2442.25.camel@emblysd024.adetel.com> References: <1325616568-17471-1-git-send-email-abelloni@adeneo-embedded.com> <1325616568-17471-2-git-send-email-abelloni@adeneo-embedded.com> <20120103210841.7a5ff77a@skate> <1325675997.2442.25.camel@emblysd024.adetel.com> Message-ID: <20120104133903.6a7edf69@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:19:57 +0100, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit : > It won't compile without it because the files are duplicate, the linker > will complain about symbols being defined twice. I definitely tried to > keep the patch as small as possible. Ok. > Th fact is that they are already duplicated in the original source. Is > it worth patching the makefiles to unify those ? > > Upstream is trying to unify everything. I hope t will be done at some > point in time. Ok. Then I'm fine with those. > Will be done but $(MAKE) won't work as it isn't possible to compile > using multiple jobs. Is it worth fixing the makefiles for a so small > piece of code ? Then specify: LPC32XXCDL_MAKE = $(MAKE1) And Buildroot will use make -j1 to build this package specifically. See package/at/at.mk for an example. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com