Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael S. Zick <minimod@morethan.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Can't use output/host/ as "SDK" with external toolchain
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:19:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201201110820.00566.minimod@morethan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LVOnJ25zLqdBwoLXX0XORPwNp_pGab_+6xB9Zsi2TJhig@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed January 11 2012, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Bryce Schober <bryce.schober@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As I said in my original post, I am using an externally generated and
> > configured (and statically linked) crosstool-ng toolchain.
> 
> I'm sorry, I read over that part.
> 
> > I believe that it
> > is the buildroot import thereof that is at fault. Again, in summary:
> > 1. Buildroot generates absolute-pathed symbolic links to the external
> > binutils in output/host/usr/bin instead of copying them in.
> > 2. Buildroot's ext-toolchain-wrapper uses an absolute path for its sysroot
> > configuration.
> > 3. Buildroot's ext-toolchain-wrapper uses?an?absolute path for its binary
> > exec path.
> >
> > I realize that these problems are triggered by my specification of:
> > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_PATH="$(TOPDIR)/../my-ext-toolchain-dir/"
> > But I can't specify merely "../my-ext-toolchain-dir/" without breaking
> > things either.
> >
> 
> Have you tried using BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_DOWNLOAD instead? This
> requires you to archive the crosstool-ng toolchain and specify it to
> buildroot. Buildroot will then extract it and unpack. The binutils
> will be copied in this case, and not symlinked.
> 
> This is not possibly in stock buildroot. I have submitted patches for
> this a while ago, but they are not yet included. I think there was a
> comment by Thomas that I still have to fix. In the mean time, try
> using patches 1 and 2 of the following series:
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2011-August/044779.html
>

The best kind of 'bump' for things in the "Pending" box,
somebody needs it. 

Shall we invent a 'Needed-by: ... ' attribute for the pending patches?

Mike
> Best regards,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Thomas De Schampheleire
> > <patrickdepinguin+buildroot@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Bryce,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Bryce Schober <bryce.schober@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > What I mean by "SDK" is the ability to compile external programs using
> >> > the
> >> > buildroot toolchain and libraries on any reasonably-compatible host. I'm
> >> > assuming that the toolchain itself is built properly static for its own
> >> > host
> >> > independence (which in my case, it is).?Ideally the toolchain in the
> >> > output/host directory would be capable of standing alone, when built
> >> > properly
> >> >
> >> > I'm having two issues w/ archving the?output/host dir for extraction and
> >> > usage in a different host directory. I'm using a custom-built
> >> > crosstool-ng
> >> > built externally and independent of buildroot.
> >> >
> >> > The external toolchain import results in three distinct problems that I
> >> > can
> >> > see:
> >> > 1. The symbolic links for binutils binaries in use absolute paths to
> >> > link to
> >> > the external toolchain instead of copying them in.
> >> > 2. The ext-toolchain-wrapper uses an absolute path for the sysroot
> >> > directory.
> >> > 3. The ext-toolchain-wrapper seems to point to the old (import-from) bin
> >> > directory, not the path to which the toolchain has been copied.
> >> >
> >> > I'm not particularly familiar with the relocatability of toolchains or
> >> > buildroot's method thereof, and so am not sure where to start with a
> >> > proposal, let alone a patch. If I could get some direction as to how
> >> > best to
> >> > tackle this, I'd be grateful.
> >>
> >> It is known that the toolchains generated by buildroot are not
> >> relocatable.
> >> However, you can tell buildroot to create the toolchain with
> >> crosstool-ng, and this one is relocatable. I suggest you give that a
> >> try to see if it solves your problems.
> >> I'm using buildroot in the same way and it works fine for me.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Thomas
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-11 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-09 22:54 [Buildroot] Can't use output/host/ as "SDK" with external toolchain Bryce Schober
2012-01-10 11:26 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2012-01-10 20:22   ` Bryce Schober
2012-01-11  7:38     ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2012-01-11 14:19       ` Michael S. Zick [this message]
2012-01-11 19:49       ` Bryce Schober
2012-01-11 23:03         ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-01-12  9:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201201110820.00566.minimod@morethan.org \
    --to=minimod@morethan.org \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox