From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:12:35 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] re: new package In-Reply-To: <1327240226-6082-1-git-send-email-arnout@mind.be> References: <1327240226-6082-1-git-send-email-arnout@mind.be> Message-ID: <20120123111235.58b957ff@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:50:24 +0100, "Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)" a ?crit : > package/Config.in | 1 + > package/re/Config.in | 11 +++++++++++ > package/re/re.mk | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Upstream, the package seems to be named 'libre' (the tarball is named re-..., but the library is documented as libre on the website), shouldn't we use the same name in Buildroot? > +define RE_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS > + $(INSTALL) -m 644 -D $(@D)/libre.so $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/libre.so > +endef I guess that the package build system doesn't use .so versioning? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com