From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:31:09 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] re: new package In-Reply-To: <20120123111235.58b957ff@skate> References: <1327240226-6082-1-git-send-email-arnout@mind.be> <20120123111235.58b957ff@skate> Message-ID: <201201232131.09850.arnout@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Monday 23 January 2012 11:12:35 Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Le Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:50:24 +0100, > "Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)" a ?crit : > > > package/Config.in | 1 + > > package/re/Config.in | 11 +++++++++++ > > package/re/re.mk | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Upstream, the package seems to be named 'libre' (the tarball is named > re-..., but the library is documented as libre on the website), > shouldn't we use the same name in Buildroot? I also found libre a more logical name, but since the tar was called re-$(VERSION).tar.gz I thought to keep that. I hadn't thought of looking at the official name on the website, though. I'll make a respin with libre instead of re. > > +define RE_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS > > + $(INSTALL) -m 644 -D $(@D)/libre.so $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/libre.so > > +endef > > I guess that the package build system doesn't use .so versioning? Not that I could find, no. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F