From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael S. Zick Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:07:25 -0600 Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot Developer Day, Friday 3rd February, Brussels In-Reply-To: <201201251204.35978.minimod@morethan.org> References: <20120124000812.6d043023@skate> <20120125135707.6ceb7e86@skate> <201201251204.35978.minimod@morethan.org> Message-ID: <201201251207.27503.minimod@morethan.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Wed January 25 2012, Michael S. Zick wrote: > On Wed January 25 2012, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Le Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:03:12 +0100, > > Thomas De Schampheleire a ?crit : > > > > > Some topics we could discuss: > > > > > > - status of some things that were discussed on the previous BDD > > > -- send-patches > > > -- testing infrastructure > > > -- crosstool-ng integration > > > -- documentation migration > > > -- out-of-tree builds > > > -- website update > > > -- maintenance process / patchwork > > > -- relocatable toolchain > > > > > > - things that may need further discussion: > > > -- license stuff (report generation, ...) > > > -- finalization of Acked-by / Signed-off-by / Reviewed-by discussion. > > > We talked about this before, but as far as I know there was no final > > > decision as to: we'll do it this way. > > > > > A suggestion which passed by on the OpenEmbedded M.L. recently that might > Oops, wrong credit, should have been: OpenWRT mailing list. Mike > fit into that discussion: > > On the 'Tested-by:' attribute (if used) then adding a classification of > what that testing covered or did not cover (whichever is most informative). > I.E: > > Tested-by: J. Q. Public > Coverage: HP, PA-RISC only > or > Coverage-needed: World > > Examples above are invented only to display the coverage attribute names. > > Mike > > > > - future directions for buildroot > > > -- deprecate customize package > > > -- ... > > > > > > I'll let you know if I think of other things. > > > > Sounds like a good start. However, I fear that on most topics, no much > > progress has been made since the Prague BDD. But this upcoming BDD will > > gather more developers, so probably we'll be able to spread the > > development effort a bit more, and it's good to make a status on items > > that were discussed in previous meetings. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot > >