Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Using custom kernel headers instead toolchain headers
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:19:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203192319.22728.arnout@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332183352.6228.94.camel@desktop>

On Monday 19 March 2012 19:55:52 lexa wrote:
> I use buildroot-2012.02 with external toolchain named "Sourcery
> CodeBench ARM 2011.03". 
> 
> This toolchain contain linux headers, but i dont want to use them. I
> want to use header compiled from my kernel, is it possible ?

 Short answer: no.

 The kernel headers are used to compile the C library, which needs to
know which system calls exist, how various things are defined, and
sometimes which features exist.  So using different kernel headers
for compiling other libraries or programs is a bad idea, because it
may lead to inconsistencies.

 However, the kernel you compile doesn't need to be the same as the
toolchain's kernel headers.  It just has to be newer.  This is
possible because Linus makes sure that every Linux release is
ABI compatible with previous releases.


 There is one reason why you may want to use different kernel headers
than the ones of the toolchain, and that's when you have a vendor
kernel that defines additional ioctl's used by device drivers that
are not (yet) upstreamed.  In this case, you need access to your
vendor kernel's headers.  AFAIK buildroot doesn't really support this
use case.

 Regards,
 Arnout

-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                               arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect                 +32-16-286540
Essensium/Mind                                     http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium                BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20120319/e1ea533a/attachment-0001.html>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-19 22:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-19 18:55 [Buildroot] Using custom kernel headers instead toolchain headers lexa
2012-03-19 22:19 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2012-03-21  9:26   ` lexa
2012-03-21 18:15     ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201203192319.22728.arnout@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox