From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] valgrind: allow selecting which tools to install
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 20:51:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203252051.17560.arnout@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d26fc988e01a367dd05.1331743859@beantl019720>
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 17:50:59 Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> The full valgrind installation takes more than 20 MB, while one typically does
> not use all of its tools. This patch adds extra config options to select which
> tools to install.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de.schampheleire@gmail.com>
Strange that this patch didn't get any feedback before... I guess we
all trust Thomas enough to make good patches :-)
I'm a bit at loss as to what to do now. I believe this patch is useful
and good enough to go in as it is. So:
Acked-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
On the other hand, I do have some ideas how to make it even better.
But if I write these down, I'm afraid it will slow down the inclusion
of a useful and well-implemented feature... Well, I'll take the risk:
[snip]
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK
> + bool "Memcheck: a memory error detector"
> + default y
> + help
> + This option allows to install the Memcheck tool
> +
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND_CACHEGRIND
> + bool "Cachegrind: a cache and branch-prediction profiler"
> + default y
> + help
> + This option allows to install the Cachegrind tool
Even though this breaks existing configurations, I believe that all
tools (with the possible exception of memcheck) should default to
no. For existing configurations, that's what most people will want
anyway. And for new configurations, I think it's usually just one,
maybe two tools that are needed, so it's a lot of work to disable
all of them.
[snip]
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND_PTRCHECK
> + bool "Ptrcheck: an experimental head, stack and global array overrun detector"
> + default y
> + help
> + This option allows to install the Ptrcheck tool
At the very least, the experimental ones should default to no.
[snip]
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND_NULGRIND
> + bool "Nulgrind: the minimal Valgrind tool"
> + default y
> + help
> + This option allows to install the Nulgrind tool
And this one definitely should default to no.
[snip]
> +ifeq ($(BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK),)
> +define VALGRIND_REMOVE_MEMCHECK
> + rm -f $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/valgrind/*memcheck*
> +endef
> +
> +VALGRIND_POST_INSTALL_TARGET_HOOKS += VALGRIND_REMOVE_MEMCHECK
> +endif
It's probably just personal preference, but I like to see:
define VALGRIND_REMOVE_MEMCHECK
rm -f $(TARGET_DIR)/usr/lib/valgrind/*memcheck*
endef
VALGRIND_POST_INSTALL_TARGET_HOOKS += $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_VALGRIND_MEMCHECK),,VALGRIND_REMOVE_MEMCHECK)
(although the double comma isn't making things very clear either...)
It would actually be better to not build the unneeded tools at all, by
setting
VALGRIND_MAKE_OPT = TOOLS="..." EXP_TOOLS="..."
Unfortunately, Makefile.autotools.in doesn't use PKG_MAKE_OPT for the
install targets (which is probably a bug...), so that won't work.
[snip]
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-25 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 16:50 [Buildroot] [PATCH] valgrind: allow selecting which tools to install Thomas De Schampheleire
2012-03-23 14:52 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2012-03-25 18:51 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2012-04-05 14:40 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203252051.17560.arnout@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox