From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 02:55:58 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] lsof: add busybox tweaks
In-Reply-To: <20120426164511.2f6e462d@skate>
References: <1335435324-18792-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 <1335435324-18792-2-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 <20120426140840.GJ20601@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <20120426164511.2f6e462d@skate>
Message-ID: <20120427005558.GA20161@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 16:45 Thu 26 Apr     , Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Le Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:08:40 +0200,
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> a ?crit :
> 
> > > +if BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_SHOW_OTHERS
> > >  source "package/lsof/Config.in"
> > put a depends on BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_SHOW_OTHERS
> > 
> > in lsof/Config.in
> 
> No, that's not what we do for all other packages. Gustavo's patch is
> correct with regard to the current guidelines.
> 
> Now, whether we should change those guidelines to something else is a
> different story. But if we change the guideline, it should be changed
> for all packages and not just for lsof.
package/kmod/Config.in is already like this

and it's more clean

Best Regards,
J.