From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] libqwt: new package
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:10:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201204281710.50808.arnout@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8B3459.1030304@gezedo.com>
On Sunday 15 April 2012 22:49:29 Laurent GONZALEZ wrote:
> hi there,
>
> with the help of Thomas, I propose this patch to add libqwt.
Hoi Laurent,
Thank you for your contribution! We have pretty strict requirements
for incoming patches, so here are some comments.
First of all, please post patches in the form as it is produced by
git send-email, i.e.:
- one separate mail per patch;
- Subject of the mail is "[PATCH] qwt: new package";
- Body of the mail has the following structure:
Commit message (typically empty in case of a new package, unless there
is something special to say about it).
Signed-off-by: Your full name <your.email@address.net>
Signed-off-by: Other contributer name <his.email@address.org>
---
Additional free-text comments that should not go into the commit
message. If you post a second or third version of the patch, this
typically contains a changelog.
---
diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in
index d703b8c..d72fcc3 100644
--- a/package/Config.in
+++ b/package/Config.in
...
Second, each patch should contain your Signed-off-by line. This is a
statement from you that you have the right to publish it. See
http://elinux.org/Developer_Certificate_Of_Origin
Note that even Thomas's patch should contain your sign-off because you're
in its forwarding path.
And now some comments about the libqwt patch itself.
Since the upstream package is called qwt, I'd call the buildroot package
qwt instead of libqwt. Also, because it provides a widget, I'd put it
under 'other GUIs', directly below qt.
The help text of the Config.in should be wrapped at 80 columns (where the
tab counts as 8 characters).
For the sed expressions, I'd use % everywhere to make it more consistent.
There will probably be more remarks, but it's easier to comment on those
when the patch is posted inline instead of as an attachment.
If you don't have the time to continue work on this patch, please let us
know so someone else can pick it up.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-28 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-15 20:49 [Buildroot] libqwt: new package Laurent GONZALEZ
2012-04-28 15:10 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201204281710.50808.arnout@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox