From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:57:26 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] sam-ba: only propose it if the host is
 x86 or x86_64
In-Reply-To: <87d36gcb5y.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
References: <1334675140-20303-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
 <1334675140-20303-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
 <20120423065000.GL20601@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <20120427101956.GA2992@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <20120504050148.GD20123@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <20120507134551.GB10138@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <87d36gcb5y.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk>
Message-ID: <20120507155726.GC10138@game.jcrosoft.org>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 16:34 Mon 07 May     , Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >>>>> "Jean-Christophe" == Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> writes:
> 
>  Jean-Christophe> it's the for ping
> 
>  Jean-Christophe> did I need to understand that noe one care of non x86 host?
> 
> To me it is more of a question of tradeoffs. Either we do it really
> right and use this kind of infrastructure for the external toolchains as
> well (where it really matters), or we decide the extra complexity isn't
> worth it for the few non-x86 users.
> 
> I haven't made up my mind about this yet, but am leaning towards the
> 2nd.
as a non x86 user I really care

and as the ARM A15 will come soon on the market for serer as example it will
be more and more problematic for binary package

Best Regards,
J.
> 
> -- 
> Bye, Peter Korsgaard