From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:04:44 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/5] Added host targets to gnupg and its prerequisite libraries. In-Reply-To: <1336598986-9518-5-git-send-email-stijn.souffriau@essensium.com> References: <1336598986-9518-1-git-send-email-stijn.souffriau@essensium.com> <1336598986-9518-5-git-send-email-stijn.souffriau@essensium.com> Message-ID: <20120510130444.0aef3383@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, Le Wed, 9 May 2012 23:29:46 +0200, Stijn Souffriau a ?crit : > --- > package/gnupg/gnupg.mk | 11 +++++++++++ > package/libassuan/libassuan.mk | 5 +++++ > package/libgcrypt/libgcrypt.mk | 1 + > package/libgpg-error/libgpg-error.mk | 1 + > package/libksba/libksba.mk | 5 +++++ > package/libpth/libpth.mk | 5 +++++ > 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) I am not sure we want to support building gnupg for the host. It is not needed as a build time dependency of anything, and gnupg is available in virtually all GNU/Linux distributions, and as far as I know, there are no specific version compatibility problems that would require the gnupg version on the host to be exactly the same as the one used on the target. I'd like to avoid seeing Buildroot replacing the package management system of the host distribution, for tools that are as common as gnupg. Things like u-boot-tools, or sam-ba require packages because they are typically not available in Linux distros, but it's not the case of gnupg. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com