From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH resend] owl-linux: new package
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:35:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120626093557.2de31adb@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340651389-7856-1-git-send-email-spdawson@gmail.com>
Le Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:09:49 +0100,
spdawson at gmail.com a ?crit :
> From: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>
This looks pretty good. The patches of the package should have a
Signed-off-by line, but otherwise, I'm not seeing any other issue.
I am also a bit worried about all the comment "owl-linux is only
supported blabla", because those warnings will also appear for anyone
not even doing something for ARM, and there will be two of such
warnings.
Maybe group the ARM9 and EABI checks into one comment? And maybe make
it visible only on ARM?
comment "owl-linux is only supported on ARM9 architecture with EABI"
depends on !(BR2_arm920t || BR2_arm922t || BR2_arm926t) || !BR2_ARM_EABI
depends on BR2_arm
or something like that.
> +define OWL_LINUX_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS
> + $(MAKE) -C $(LINUX_DIR) $(LINUX_MAKE_FLAGS) M="$(@D)" modules_install
> +endef
At some point in the discussion, it was mentioned that this driver
might only work with one particular CodeSourcery toolchain, which would
suggest that it uses the C library, and therefore contain userspace
code. But here you're only installing the kernel module itself. Could
you clarify this point, just for our (my?) knowledge?
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-26 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 19:09 [Buildroot] [PATCH resend] owl-linux: new package spdawson at gmail.com
2012-06-26 7:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-06-26 8:07 ` Simon Dawson
2012-06-26 8:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-05 6:47 spdawson at gmail.com
2012-05-25 21:07 spdawson at gmail.com
2012-06-04 23:16 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-06-05 6:36 ` Simon Dawson
2012-05-25 12:51 spdawson at gmail.com
2012-05-25 20:08 ` Peter Korsgaard
[not found] ` <CAC1BbcRi_0KzkKP7Pfi6e407kp3QGyiWj+mVEA355z_HeC1qvg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-25 20:33 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2012-05-25 21:01 ` Simon Dawson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120626093557.2de31adb@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox