From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 14:30:08 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Add support for the Calao-systems USB-A9263 In-Reply-To: <4FF6BA67.3070207@calao-systems.com> References: <4FF6BA67.3070207@calao-systems.com> Message-ID: <20120706143008.64d0e023@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Gr?gory, Le Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:13:59 +0200, gregory hermant a ?crit : > Hi, > Attached a patch for the USB-A9263. > More info at . > > > Signed-off-by: Gregory Hermant > --- > .../usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch | 851 ++++++++++ > board/calao/usb-a9263/usb-a9263_defconfig | 1662 ++++++++++++++++++++ > configs/usb_a9263_defconfig | 1247 +++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 3760 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 board/calao/usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch > create mode 100644 board/calao/usb-a9263/usb-a9263_defconfig > create mode 100644 configs/usb_a9263_defconfig Thanks for this contribution. Both the kernel configuration and the bootloader configuration, we prefer to use defconfig files, which are smaller. To generate the Buildroot defconfig file: make savedefconfig To generate the Linux defconfig file: make linux-savedefconfig Also, do you know if at some point Atmel will create an upstream for at91bootstrap? I've seen they have created some Github repository with at91bootstrap sources. I'm a bit worried about integrating a patch that has no upstream to be submitted, which means that we will have to carry it around forever. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com