Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] pkg-infra: limit -reconfigure and -rebuild actions
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 14:54:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120721145411.6e291ad2@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720233136.GA25851@mail.sceen.net>

Le Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:31:36 +0200,
Richard Braun <rbraun@sceen.net> a ?crit :

> To clarify my point of view: the intended behaviour is obvious, and
> I assumed the original author knew what he wanted when these targets
> were added.

Actually, the original author was me :-)

See 4ed4e5016b741341059ed826416dad3291df0b2c.

> But my use cases are rather the following: I am making
> modifications to the source code of a package, and I want to easily use
> the environment provided by buildroot (the toolchain, the staging
> directory and the target optimizations, maybe others). If it fails, it
> will stop in either case. But if it succeeds, I want to easily check the
> output and make sure the build process produced the expected results
> (I mostly check compiler warnings, sometimes the generated code). If I
> am confident in the results, I just add && make (which is short and
> simple enough) to get the current behaviour.
> 
> I usually use buildroot with two flavors of configuration: a production
> one, and a developer one (with debugging symbols, target debugging tools
> such as valgrind, sometimes -O0 executables). This can result in huge
> images, so getting to that step while the build of the package I'm
> working on didn't reach a state I can confidently validate doesn't make
> sense. And when it does (and even if it doesn't), simply adding
> "&& make" does the job.

It does make some sense, but I'd like to see the opinion of others.

However, I don't agree with the change you did on -reconfigure that
would only to the configure step. If -rebuild does build+install, then
-reconfigure should do configure+build+install.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-21 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 13:39 [Buildroot] [PATCH] pkg-infra: limit -reconfigure and -rebuild actions Richard Braun
2012-07-20 15:34 ` Émeric Vigier
2012-07-20 15:58   ` Richard Braun
2012-07-20 21:55     ` Émeric Vigier
2012-07-20 20:27 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-07-20 23:31   ` Richard Braun
2012-07-21 12:54     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-07-21 15:17       ` Richard Braun
2012-07-21 16:14         ` Samuel Martin
2012-07-22 18:27           ` Alex Bradbury
2012-12-14 13:49             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-07-24 23:07           ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-08-02 13:28             ` Alex Bradbury
2012-08-02 13:36               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-09-21 16:57                 ` Alex Bradbury
2012-07-22 19:20   ` Stephan Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120721145411.6e291ad2@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox