From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:15:14 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Clarify MIPS ABIs support In-Reply-To: <20120725203109.5d295941@skate> References: <1343162828-13060-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <50102DAA.1030400@mind.be> <20120725202503.7ecae923@skate> <20120725203109.5d295941@skate> Message-ID: <20120725211514.1ee35d6a@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:31:09 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni a ?crit : > Thinking more about this, the way we do things for i386 vs. x86_64 is > not optimal: there are two complete distinct sets of entries for the > processor types. One for i386, one for x86_64. However, there should > normally be a big overlap between the two, since all x86_64 processors > support the i386 architecture. So maybe we should have a single list, > with certain processor not being visible in the i386. This would ensure > consistency between the list of processors available on i386 and x86_64. In other words, something like: