From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] at91bootstrap: bump version to 3.2
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 08:55:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120727085540.211a4709@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343248264-6435-1-git-send-email-spdawson@gmail.com>
Hello,
Le Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:31:04 +0100,
spdawson at gmail.com a ?crit :
> From: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Dawson <spdawson@gmail.com>
> ---
> boot/at91bootstrap/Config.in | 28 +-
> .../at91bootstrap-1.16-eabi-fix.patch | 334 ---------
> .../at91bootstrap-1.16-u-boot-relocation-fix.patch | 299 --------
> .../at91bootstrap-3.2-u-boot-relocation-fix.patch | 750 ++++++++++++++++++++
> boot/at91bootstrap/at91bootstrap.mk | 34 +-
> 5 files changed, 769 insertions(+), 676 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 boot/at91bootstrap/at91bootstrap-1.16-eabi-fix.patch
> delete mode 100644 boot/at91bootstrap/at91bootstrap-1.16-u-boot-relocation-fix.patch
> create mode 100644 boot/at91bootstrap/at91bootstrap-3.2-u-boot-relocation-fix.patch
For this package, I am not sure we can do a simple version bump. Since
there is (was?) no upstream for AT91Bootstrap 1.x, many
vendors/companies had to maintain their patches on top of AT91Bootstrap
1.x. See for example
board/calao/usb-a9263/at91bootstrap-1.16-usb-a9263.patch. Therefore,
removing AT91Bootstrap 1.x from the tree will prevent those platforms
to work. I know people should upgrade, but AT91Bootstrap 3.x is quite
significantly different, so the porting effort is not that simple.
Therefore, I'm wondering whether we should kee at91bootstrap as it is,
and create a separate package at91bootstrap3 for the 3.x generation.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-27 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-25 20:31 [Buildroot] [PATCH] at91bootstrap: bump version to 3.2 spdawson at gmail.com
2012-07-26 16:35 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-07-27 6:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-07-27 8:00 ` Simon Dawson
2012-07-27 8:31 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120727085540.211a4709@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox