From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:40:14 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] at91bootstrap3: new package In-Reply-To: References: <1343389506-7469-1-git-send-email-spdawson@gmail.com> <20120727140010.2a926b49@skate> Message-ID: <20120727144014.062aad4e@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:09:27 +0100, Simon Dawson a ?crit : > > Are you this actually works? If the defconfig are minimal defconfigs > > generated by "make savedefconfig", then just copying them to .config > > and running make will ask the user the value of all options that are > > not defined in the .config file. > > It does work, yes. (At least in the handful of cases that I've > tested.) Looking at the files, however, I don't think they really are > defconfigs proper: they appear to be full-blown configuration files. Does the kconfig in at91bootstrap3 supports savedefconfig? If it does, then I would prefer it we supported minimal defconfigs. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com