Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] ext-toolchain-wrapper issues
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:19:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120804111932.6e0f0481@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9DZUSdA9fgHZjgNu3bY8Ue4d6V+4o0USbR6_dcOPsCAfxgiQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

Le Fri, 3 Aug 2012 12:21:06 -0500,
Dallas Clement <dallas.a.clement@gmail.com> a ?crit :

> I have been having trouble booting a uImage on my armada-xp
> development board.

Interesting, I'm also working around the Armada 370 and Armada XP. What
are you doing with this platform?

> I am building with an external toolchain.  When
> building the linux kernel via buildroot, the supported machine types
> were all garbled, and the kernel would not boot.

The Armada XP support in mainline doesn't need machine type, it uses
the device tree.

> # ls -l output/host/usr/bin
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 dallasc dallasc     21 Aug  2 15:53
> arm-marvell-linux-gnueabi-gcc -> ext-toolchain-wrapper
> 
> # rm arm-marvell-linux-gnueabi-gcc
> 
> # ln
> -s /opt/armada-sdk-5.0/armv7-marvell-linux-gnueabi-softfp/bin/arm-marvell-linux-gnueabi-gcc
> arm-marvell-linux-gnueabi-gcc

Is this Marvell toolchain available somewhere so I can try to reproduce
the problem?

> Lo and behold, after rebuilding the kernel, it booted just fine.
> Clearly there is some difference in the compiler options when relying
> on ext-toolchain-wrapper that is leading to trouble.
> 
> Apart from tweaking the links as I have done, is there a way to
> disable the use of ext-toolchain-wrapper?  I think I'll be fine
> without it.

No, the correct way is to use the ext-toolchain-wrapper, because it
ensures that the right --sysroot option is passed, as well as a few
other important compiler options. The right solution is to find out
which option is causing problem, and understand why.

You can modify ext-toolchain-wrapper.c to progressively remove some
option that it passes to the compiler to see which one is problematic.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-04  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-03 17:21 [Buildroot] ext-toolchain-wrapper issues Dallas Clement
2012-08-04  9:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-08-04 16:25   ` Dallas Clement
2012-08-04 16:58     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-08-08 16:12       ` Dallas Clement
2012-08-08 19:07         ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120804111932.6e0f0481@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox