From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:45:26 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch for-2012.08/systemd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20120809114526.742e2e38@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Dmitry, Le Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:14:50 -0400, Dmitry Golubovsky a ?crit : > While still a bit away from this project (and will resume work on > patches for linux-pam as soon as I can), I think I can also contribute > into the systemd discussion: > > Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Also, it would be good to investigate the newer versions of > > systemd. If I remember correctly, they integrate udev directly, but > > is it possible to still have udev separately? This of course will > > not be for 2012.08, but it would be nice to continue to integrate > > those technologies into Buildroot. > > My latest systemd patches are for version 186 (don't worry about 185 > in patches themselves: this part of the path is discarded anyway - and > now there is 187). See here: > > https://gitorious.org/lfa/myroot/trees/master/systemd-pam > > Code layout changed considerably in this new version series (185 and > up). This repository is unfortunately a bit unusable: it isn't a fork from the original Buildroot repository. Why did you create a new repository that contains just the source code of a package? You should instead clone the original Buildroot repository, create a branch, and push it on Gitorious. Also, your work on PAM+systemd should not be a new systemd-pam package: it should be integrated (probably with configuration options) into the existing systemd package. > Yes, they integrated udev together with systemd, and I do not see any > option to build udev separately from their source tree: there isn't > even such repo as udev at freedesktop. > > Now I see that Buildroot gets udev from different source. Could these > be just two mutually exclusive config options: either to build udev > with systemd, or udev standalone (and disable building of systemd)? Now that udev is part of the systemd sources, do they publish new udev-only release tarballs? I guess not. If I'm correct, then we should simply remove the 'udev' package, and implement a mechanism to allow the systemd package to install only udev, or udev+systemd. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com