From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Open question: remove "toolchain on target" option
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:21:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120811202114.3a95d4ab@skate> (raw)
Hello,
Today, I'd like to open the debate of the "toolchain on target"
configuration option. This option normally allows to install
binutils/gcc, and together with "install development files on target",
should allow to have a complete development environment on the target.
However, I see a number of problems with this:
(1) A large number of first time users try to use this, and fall into
problems, because this feature is mostly unmaintained. This gives
a poor image of Buildroot's quality.
(2) A large number of first time users try to use this, because they
misunderstand what Buildroot is (a cross-compilation environment)
and they try to use it for something that nobody amongst the core
Buildroot developers is doing, and therefore is poorly supported.
(3) None of the core Buildroot developers seem to care about this,
no-one is apparently using/fixing this mechanism.
So, rather than having a bad and dysfunctional mechanism to have a
toolchain on the target, I would suggest that we simply get rid of it.
Of course, I am not going to take the decision alone, Peter will have
to do it, but I wanted to start the discussion around this topic and
gather opinions from people in the community.
Thoughts?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-11 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-11 18:21 Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-08-11 18:44 ` [Buildroot] Open question: remove "toolchain on target" option Richard Braun
2012-08-11 19:46 ` Michael S. Zick
2012-08-11 20:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-08-12 5:06 ` Jonathan Liu
2012-08-12 5:13 ` Charles Krinke
2012-08-15 9:56 ` Michael S. Zick
2012-08-15 10:39 ` Alex Bradbury
2012-08-15 15:39 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120811202114.3a95d4ab@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox