From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:23:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] openssl: security bump to version 1.0.0j In-Reply-To: <502E7775.2060006@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1336751148-28858-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <20120817184902.61d989c0@skate> <502E7775.2060006@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20120817192301.2d60a15c@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:55:17 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias a ?crit : > 1.0.1 is security-vulnerable, so it can't be bumped as-is, the target > should be 1.0.1c at the moment. Yes, agreed. I was referring to 1.0.1 as a branch, not specifically to 1.0.1. The patch I mentioned did target 1.0.1 because this patch is about 6 months old. > The big difference between 1.0.0* and 1.0.1* is that the later has > initial support for TLSv1.1 and TLSv1.2 among other minor details. > Both are API compatible though not ABI (and we don't care). > I can give it a test during the weekend and give it a go for -next. Great, thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com