From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:17:06 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2012-09-01 In-Reply-To: <504319A8.5070903@relinux.de> References: <20120902063244.629BF428001@lolut.humanoidz.org> <504319A8.5070903@relinux.de> Message-ID: <20120903091706.47c0b600@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:32:40 +0200, Stephan Hoffmann a ?crit : > I just started looking at this. The cause of the problem is that the > tool chain lacks suppot for the "versionsort" routine. > > In uClinux there is a patch adding a versionsort to alsalib locally, but > this doesn't seem to be a good solution to me, especially since I assume > that most other toolchains have versionsort so that such a patch would > breal other architectures. The configure script can detect whether this function is provided by the toolchain, and only if not provided, enable the internal version. > There are also some other patches for alsa-lib that would be needed to > support blackfin. How shall we handle such architecture dependent patches? We don't like architecture specific patches. This one for example has no reason to be architecture-specific, it just needs to be written properly :-) Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com