From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:22:36 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] New top-level directory: system In-Reply-To: <201209042253.05822.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> References: <201209042253.05822.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <20120905112236.09691dad@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le Tue, 4 Sep 2012 22:53:05 +0200, "Yann E. MORIN" a ?crit : > > Even though the skeleton and device tables could have lived in fs/, it > > would have been strange to have the UART, system hostname and other > > related options into fs/. A new system/ directory makes more sense. > > Agreed. The fs/ sub-dir is now only for all the different rootfs methods. > I'm not too fond of the 'system' name, but I can see anything else that > would be fit. I don't have a strong preference for 'system' either, but that's the only name I could find that was reasonable. Suggestions welcome. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com