From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:22:03 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 13/13] microperl: mark as DEPRECATED In-Reply-To: <1347107325-4163-13-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> References: <1347107325-4163-1-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> <1347107325-4163-13-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> Message-ID: <20120920222203.2c608fcf@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Francois Perrad, On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:28:45 +0200, Francois Perrad wrote: > Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad > --- > package/microperl/Config.in | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/package/microperl/Config.in b/package/microperl/Config.in > index 66bbedd..19d104a 100644 > --- a/package/microperl/Config.in > +++ b/package/microperl/Config.in > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_MICROPERL > bool "microperl" > # needs fork() > depends on BR2_USE_MMU > + depends on BR2_DEPRECATED If microperl is deprecated, is it really useful to have patches 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 that are making improvements to it, and updating it to a more recent version? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com