From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:35:13 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] intel-microcode: new package In-Reply-To: <20120920211255.GA32421@mail.sceen.net> References: <1348153949-30525-1-git-send-email-rbraun@sceen.net> <20120920223646.65a34101@skate> <20120920211255.GA32421@mail.sceen.net> Message-ID: <20120921103513.01871dd2@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Richard Braun, On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:12:55 +0200, Richard Braun wrote: > On the Intel download site, after searching for the last version of the > microcode data file [1], the download link leads to a license agreement > page which describes three license terms, depending on the nature of the > distributor (network administrator, end user or OEM). I think the OEM > license applies to most buildroot users. Here is the content : Ok. Thanks. And there is no zip file or tarball that contains both the license and the firmware? I'm simply worried about having just FOO_LICENSE = PROPRIETARY without a proper license file that indicates what license it is. Or maybe we need to put a special license file in package/intel-microcode/ and find a way to tell the license infrastructure that the license file is here rather than in the package itself? Cc'ing Luca on this. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com