From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:59:44 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 13/13] microperl: mark as DEPRECATED In-Reply-To: References: <1347107325-4163-1-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> <1347107325-4163-13-git-send-email-francois.perrad@gadz.org> <20120920222203.2c608fcf@skate> Message-ID: <20120921205944.774e22d6@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Fran?ois Perrad, On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:53:08 +0200, Fran?ois Perrad wrote: > I added this commit after your request in > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/180227/ (Aug. 27, 2012, 9:54 p.m.) Yes, I perfectly remember asking you to mark microperl as deprecated, since you were saying that microperl was a dead-end. My question here is different: knowing that microperl is deprecated, why would we bother bumping its version, making fixes and so on? It doesn't look really interesting to write patches against deprecated and even less interesting to review such patches :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com