From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] pkg-avail: make it work without stgit
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:52:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121014155252.744715ad@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201210141533.54869.yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:33:54 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Thomas, All,
>
> On Sunday 14 October 2012 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > In order to make this script usable by more developers, make it work
> > without stgit. It supports a --mode=stgit option or a --mode=git
> > option. When using --mode=stgit, it will preserve its existing
> > behavior, when using --mode=git, it will simply make git commits
> > without fuzzing needlessly with stgit.
>
> You are right. This script should not depend on anything else than git.
>
> That I use stgit behind the hood, when it is not a required tool imposed
> by upstream, is my problem, and should be no concern for upstream.
Well, you're the one who primarily uses this script to generate the
patches, and you'll be the one who will ultimately submit those
patches, so it sounds kind of natural that the script is adapted to
your workflow.
That said, I also wanted to be able to test your script, so I've just
adapted it to my own workflow. Since the modifications are fairly
trivial, I just thought I would share them.
> I use stgit because I like the patch-queue semantic better, and I find it
> much easier to work with, than the rebase semantic.
>
> Also, what I am interested in, is getting changes upstream; that's my goal.
> I am not interested in learning how to use *git* per-se: it is just a tool
> to achieve that goal. If I can achieve the exact same goal by using the
> much simpler stgit, then I'll use that, even if git is more powerful.
>
> And no, I never used quilt before. And no, I am not suffering of using
> stgit (quite the opposite, to be true). ;-)
No problem :)
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-14 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-09 23:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/7] Introduce the _AVAILABLE mechanism Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-09 23:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/7] docs/manual: update 'adding packages' with the new _AVAILABLE symbol Yann E. MORIN
2012-11-01 1:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-01 16:21 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-11-01 22:40 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-02 8:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-09-09 23:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/7] support/scripts: add a script to add a new package Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-14 11:14 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] pkg-avail: make it work without stgit Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-14 12:03 ` Baruch Siach
2012-10-14 12:12 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-14 13:33 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-14 13:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2012-11-01 2:00 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/7] support/scripts: add a script to add a new package Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-01 9:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-11-01 17:00 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-11-01 16:56 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-11-01 17:25 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-09 23:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/7] support/scripts: add a script to automate the migration to _AVAILABLE Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-09 23:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/7] packages: introduce the _AVAILABLE symbol to all packages Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-09 23:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 5/7] packages: use the newly-introduced _AVAILABLE symbol Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-09 23:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/7] packages: check proper use of 'select' against packages Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-09 23:40 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 7/7] script/support: get rid of now-useless pkg-avail script Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-09 23:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/7] Introduce the _AVAILABLE mechanism Yann E. MORIN
2012-09-10 6:51 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-10-14 10:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-14 14:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-14 14:31 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-14 17:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-16 5:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-10-16 17:34 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-17 21:33 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-10-17 19:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-17 19:47 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-17 20:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-17 20:16 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-17 20:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2012-10-17 20:48 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-10-30 23:11 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-10-30 23:35 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-30 23:44 ` Yann E. MORIN
2012-10-30 23:48 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-10-30 23:58 ` Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121014155252.744715ad@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox