From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Braun Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:55:47 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] pkg-infra: produce legal info for proprietary packages In-Reply-To: <50830EB4.9090200@lucaceresoli.net> References: <20120928121758.GA2362@mail.sceen.net> <1348834801-2672-1-git-send-email-rbraun@sceen.net> <20120928142314.4810033e@skate> <20120928190526.79db5cde@skate> <5068558E.4070005@mind.be> <506AEF12.5080906@lucaceresoli.net> <20121016154229.GA15417@mail.sceen.net> <50830EB4.9090200@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <20121020215547.GA13307@mail.sceen.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 10:51:00PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > This in confusing. In your previous e-mail dated Sep 20you quoted the > "Intel Software License Agreement", that one is supposed to accept before > downloading the package from the web page: Confusing indeed. > What hurts me a little is that, if intel-microcode turns out to be > redistributable, we would have no use case in mainline Buildroot that > makes use of such a feature to the legal-info code. That's what troubles me as well. I don't want to introduce dead code. But if you do it as you seem to have planned, then I won't worry about it and just wait for the feature. I'll try to get some clarification from Intel in the meanwhile. Thanks for your answer. -- Richard Braun