From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] wireshark: new package
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:31:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121024073156.GA29646@sapphire.tkos.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5086CE63.4040302@mind.be>
Hi Anout,
Thanks for reviewing.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> On 22/10/12 08:27, Baruch Siach wrote:
> >This is only the bare minimum needed to build the textual tshark utility.
> >Support for more options, including the wireshark GUI, can be added later.
> >---
> >I override the $prefix configure variable because otherwise the host
> >/usr/include is added to the -I and -L paths. I'm not sure this is a good idea
> >though, since it clutters the tshark RPATH with directories from the local
> >build paths. If you have a better I'd be glad to hear.
>
> That usually means there's a broken Makefile.am and we fix it with a patch.
> However, does installation still work with the prefix override?
Yes. However I see $prefix added to the tshark binary RPATH, which is not
nice. I'll try patching configure.in.
> [snip]
> >diff --git a/package/wireshark/wireshark.mk b/package/wireshark/wireshark.mk
> >new file mode 100644
> >index 0000000..c89fbf8
> >--- /dev/null
> >+++ b/package/wireshark/wireshark.mk
> >@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> >+WIRESHARK_VERSION = 1.8.3
> >+WIRESHARK_SOURCE = wireshark-$(WIRESHARK_VERSION).tar.bz2
> >+WIRESHARK_SITE = http://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions
> >+WIRESHARK_DEPENDENCIES = libpcap libgcrypt libglib2
> >+WIRESHARK_CONF_ENV = LIBGCRYPT_CONFIG=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr/bin/libgcrypt-config
> >+WIRESHARK_CONF_OPT = --disable-wireshark --without-krb5 --disable-usr-local \
> >+ prefix=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr --with-sysroot=$(STAGING_DIR) \
>
> Why is the --with-sysroot needed?
Removing --with-sysroot doesn't negatively affect build or run of tshark. I
get the following line during configure, however:
checking for sysroot... no
Is it significant?
> >+ --enable-static=no
>
> We normally build both dynamic and static libraries, and remove the static
> library in the target. Doesn't that work in wireshark? Can you add a comment
> to explain that?
Without --enable-static=no build fails with:
ld: tshark: hidden symbol `__GI_atan' isn't defined
My toolchain is external:
powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc (Sourcery G++ Lite 2011.03-38) 4.5.2
Any ideas?
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-24 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-22 6:27 [Buildroot] [PATCH] wireshark: new package Baruch Siach
2012-10-23 17:05 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-10-24 7:31 ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2012-10-24 7:49 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-28 8:53 Baruch Siach
2013-01-30 5:42 Baruch Siach
2013-01-30 11:47 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-01-30 12:20 ` Baruch Siach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121024073156.GA29646@sapphire.tkos.co.il \
--to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox