From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:44:42 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2 v3] xtensa: support configurable processor configurations In-Reply-To: <50A2B50F.60609@zankel.net> References: <509d9db2.4883440a.7065.016e@mx.google.com> <509DA516.40007@mind.be> <50A169FC.6010708@zankel.net> <50A16B1E.8030703@mind.be> <50A18A2B.1050102@zankel.net> <50A2ADBC.9080704@mind.be> <50A2B50F.60609@zankel.net> Message-ID: <20121113224442.70f141be@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Chris, On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:01:03 -0800, Chris Zankel wrote: > Sorry, I got your email after I sent out version 4 of the patch, which > doesn't include the change you mentioned (somehow, fetchmail was stuck > :-( So, please let me know if you want me to send out another version > that includes that change. I don't want to confuse Thomas with all > those versions... You can keep your patch as is wrt to Config.in. What I propose to do is that I merge your Xtensa support in one of my branch together with my reorganization of the architecture definitions and I send a pull-request for the whole thing to Peter. Would that be OK for you? Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com