From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baruch Siach Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:43:17 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] libusb: disable on avr32 In-Reply-To: References: <1353243578-6980-1-git-send-email-spdawson@gmail.com> <20121118130836.GE25380@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20121118131245.GF25380@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Message-ID: <20121118134316.GG25380@sapphire.tkos.co.il> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Simon, On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 01:23:49PM +0000, Simon Dawson wrote: > On 18 November 2012 13:12, Baruch Siach wrote: > >> > comment "ccid needs a toolchain with thread support" > >> > - depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS > >> > + depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS && !BR2_avr32 > >> > >> Showing this comment when BR2_avr32 is enabled is not very helpful, IMHO, > >> especially when the toolchain does have threads support. > > > > Replying to myself: was the intension here to say > > > > depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS || !BR2_avr32 > > > > ? Otherwise it doesn't make much sense either. Or am I missing something here? > > The ccid package is unavailable for avr32, and requires thread support > in the toolchain. However, it is my understanding that current > "policy" in Buildroot is not to display comments for packages that are > not available for the currently-selected target architecture. That is > why the thread-related comment is only visible if the target > architecture is not avr32. I see. Thanks for the explanation. baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -