From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:31:23 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot for avr32
In-Reply-To: <CAExDhva8qpnukgyEAogo=cJhxZkdWaFU9ekPAujCgBtgMbaTOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <memo.20121129102031.4232H@postmaster+dexdyne.com.cix.co.uk>
 <20121129113710.63d5676c@skate>
 <CAHt8ZCN5eB8shsxz+gVz6neYbwVC7kE-O=cT66MCTRQNq6o_qQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121129162848.5a761c63@skate>
 <CAHt8ZCO6Be2V+qPZ6Lu5y8kMaKipt2J=JgbbU7ZHqRXSF0c=tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAExDhvZUT2KpJfuxqg__y=PqpLYQsHXaSEa6s1Ni61UW6D4skQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121129190955.416f2373@skate>
 <CAExDhva8qpnukgyEAogo=cJhxZkdWaFU9ekPAujCgBtgMbaTOw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20121129193123.503b489b@skate>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Dear Thiago A. Corr?a,

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:25:23 -0200, Thiago A. Corr?a wrote:

> I'm talking from memory, because I haven't touched much of this for a while.
> Back then I tried patches from them and from Atmel, but complex
> software such as Qt had problems with them. They might have been
> updated since, but the most stable option was the current 4.2.2.
> 
> I suspect that at some point the AVR32 support will be dropped, even
> from kernel.

Ok, so your suggestion is to just maintain the AVR32 support in
Buildroot as is, and not spend time improving it. Is that correct?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com