From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:47:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Packet menu: X.org X Window System In-Reply-To: <20121226022529.GA5440@zuhnb712.ap.bm.net> References: <20121226022529.GA5440@zuhnb712.ap.bm.net> Message-ID: <20121226094719.64380938@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Woody Wu, On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 10:25:29 +0800, Woody Wu wrote: > I feel a little confused in the 'X.org X Window System' packet menu. > It present me with 'X Window System server' as well as 'X11R7 > servers'. Under 'X Window System server' I can choice TinyX, under > the 'X11R7 servers', I can choice x.org server. Is that a conflict? > Or does it means, in additional to TinyX, I still need to pick up a > X11R7 server to work with it? There are two things: * The selection of the "Server Type" (i.e TinyX or Modular X.org) * The enabling or disabling of the X.org server In fact, the X.org server can be compiled in two different flavors: * The modular X.org flavor, which is the one used on virtually all Linux distributions. In this flavor, the device drivers (video, input, etc.) are compiled separately from the X.org server and can be dynamically loaded. * The TinyX variant, in which drivers are directly bundled into the X server. Those drivers are more limited (in number), and are directly part of the X.org server code base (as opposed to the modular X.org, where each driver is a separate project, separate tarball. It would probably be more clear to have the Server Type selection as a sub-option of the X.org server selection. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com