From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 13:39:08 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] divine: fix divine-config In-Reply-To: <20130106083433.GH13545@sapphire.tkos.co.il> References: <1357250947-23296-1-git-send-email-stefan.froberg@petroprogram.com> <50E6BFE2.2090405@zacarias.com.ar> <50E6E757.10809@zacarias.com.ar> <50E6EDB5.9070004@petroprogram.com> <20130106054113.GD13545@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20130106083433.GH13545@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Message-ID: <20130106133908.6223837b@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Baruch Siach, On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 10:34:35 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: > So is local build directories in RPATH currently a fact of life? If so can my > wireshark package (linked above) be merged as is? Peter? We currently have packages that carry on the target a RPATH to the build directory. It is not nice, but harmless since it is highly unlikely that this path is going to exist on the target. Therefore, I wouldn't say that having the build directory as a RPATH in the final binary is a show-stopper to get the package included. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com