From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] dockstar bsp
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:24:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130117172427.190cdb5b@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1356821139-9103-1-git-send-email-stevecalfee@gmail.com>
Dear Steve Calfee,
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:45:39 -0800, Steve Calfee wrote:
> Simple bsp for the Seagate Dockstar.
>
> Builds and runs using buildroot 2012.11
>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Calfee <stevecalfee@gmail.com>
> ---
> board/sheevaplug/Config.in | 13 +
> board/sheevaplug/Makefile.in | 4 +
> board/sheevaplug/seagatedockstar/Makefile.in | 5 +
No, we really don't want per-board configuration options or Makefiles.
A board is just a particular configuration of Buildroot.
Moreover your Makefile.in files still reference some old files in
target/device/ that no longer exist.
> board/sheevaplug/seagatedockstar/README | 62 +++++
The README file should not be a story of how the thing was written, but
simply how to use this configuration on this particular hardware (how
to flash the images, etc.).
> .../dockstar_dev_external_toolchain_defconfig | 24 ++
> .../dockstar_internal_toolchain_defconfig | 21 ++
> .../dockstar_toolchain_only_defconfig | 16 ++
Those configurations are useless as they are not visible through "make
help" or "make <foobar>_defconfig". And anyway, we only want one
configuration per board.
> .../seagatedockstar/linux-3.2plus.config | 294 ++++++++++++++++++++
> board/sheevaplug/seagatedockstar/patchrootfs.sh | 14 +
> .../seagatedockstar/skeleton/etc/inittab | 46 +++
> .../sheevaplug/seagatedockstar/skeleton/etc/shadow | 12 +
Why is it needed to override the default inittab and shadow?
> configs/dockstart_defconfig | 21 ++
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/configs/dockstart_defconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +BR2_arm=y
> +BR2_arm926t=y
Ok for those two ones.
> +BR2_JLEVEL=4
> +BR2_PACKAGE_GDB=y
> +BR2_ENABLE_LOCALE_PURGE=y
> +BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_LARGEFILE=y
> +BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_INET_IPV6=y
> +BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_INET_RPC=y
> +BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_LOCALE=y
> +BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_CXX=y
> +BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_HOSTNAME="dockstar"
> +BR2_TARGET_GENERIC_ISSUE="Welcome to Dockstar and Buildroot"
> +BR2_ROOTFS_POST_BUILD_SCRIPT="$(TOPDIR)/board/sheevaplug/seagatedockstar/patchrootfs.sh"
I don't think any of these is needed.
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_UBIFS=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_UBIFS_RT_ZLIB=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_UBI=y
> +BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR_GZIP=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_USE_CUSTOM_CONFIG=y
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILE="$(topdir)board/sheevaplug/seagatedockstar/linux-3.2plus.config"
> +BR2_LINUX_KERNEL_INSTALL_TARGET=y
Ok. Is installation of the kernel image inside the target filesystem
really needed? How does this board boots?
To summarize, a board configuration in Buildroot is just:
* A minimal defconfig in configs/<blabla>_defconfig, that selects the
proper architecture, proper bootloader, filesystem image format and
kernel version/configuration. No toolchain options, no packages, etc.
* Possibly in board/<manufacturer>/<boardname>/, a kernel
configuration file, a README file, and other files that have to be
added in the root filesystem to make the board work.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-29 22:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH] dockstar bsp Steve Calfee
2013-01-17 16:09 ` Steve Calfee
2013-01-17 16:24 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-01-17 20:02 ` Steve Calfee
2013-01-19 13:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130117172427.190cdb5b@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox