Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC v1 05/14] autotools infrastructure: do the autoreconf as a post patch step
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:13:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130128091347.4f2288ca@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5105A7BF.4080701@mind.be>

Dear Arnout Vandecappelle,

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 23:18:39 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:

> > So maybe the
> > autotools infrastructure needs a special hook in the generic
> > infrastructure (rather than a normal post patch hook), to ensure
> > that the autoreconf step gets executed after all post patch hooks?
> 
>   Or maybe (just thinking out loud here) there could be the
> possibility for the package infrastructure to add additional steps in
> the dependency chain. Something like
> 
> ifeq ($$($(2)_AUTORECONF),YES)
> $(2)_TARGET_AUTORECONFIGURE = $$($(3)_SRCDIR)/.stamp_autoreconfigured
> $(1)-autoreconfigure: $(1)-patch $$($(2)_TARGET_AUTORECONFIGURE)
> $(1)-configure: $(1)-autoreconfigure
> endif

Sounds interesting. I'll try to experiment around this idea.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-28  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-20 23:52 [Buildroot] [RFC v1] Prototype implementation of per-package out of tree build Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 01/14] Add a new "src" directory in the output directory Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-21 13:47   ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-21 17:16     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-22 10:15       ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-22 16:49         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-22 17:12           ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-23 15:45             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-24 10:34               ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 02/14] package infrastructure: move subdir support to autotools Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 03/14] generic infrastructure: out of tree build support Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-24 21:41   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 04/14] autotools infrastructure: support out of tree build Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-24 21:57   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 05/14] autotools infrastructure: do the autoreconf as a post patch step Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-26 22:03   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-01-27 16:27     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-27 22:18       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-01-28  8:13         ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 06/14] cmake infrastructure: support out of tree build Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 07/14] busybox: " Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 08/14] mtd: " Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 09/14] barebox: " Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 10/14] uboot: " Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 11/14] linux: " Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 12/14] autoconf: fix out-of-tree build Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 13/14] cmake: support out of tree build Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 23:52 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1 14/14] makedevs: " Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-21  4:24 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1] Prototype implementation of per-package out oftree build Przemyslaw Wrzos
2013-01-21 17:26   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-21 18:51     ` Stephan Hoffmann
2013-01-24 20:12 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v1] Prototype implementation of per-package out of tree build Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130128091347.4f2288ca@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox