From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:42:31 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] Python 3 external packages support In-Reply-To: <1360597236.46911.YahooMailNeo@web171802.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> References: <1360594442.60393.YahooMailNeo@web171801.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <20130211160908.2da60098@skate> <1360595860.22602.YahooMailNeo@web171805.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <20130211162231.0ac06f9c@skate> <1360597236.46911.YahooMailNeo@web171802.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20130211164231.1baeb62f@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Patrick, On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:40:36 +0000 (GMT), Patrick wrote: > Does it sounds accetable to move all the Python related stuff > (python2, python3 and all python-* packages) to a single directory > called python ? I know that you would like to have a flat > arborescence for all packages, but this will help to provide a more > friendly python menu The tree of directory is not related to the layout of the menus in menuconfig/xconfig. So you can perfectly have a flat tree of directories, and an hierarchical representation of options in menuconfig/xconfig. In terms of directories, we prefer a flat solution I believe, even though it's true some package groups do have their own subdirectory (for example x11r7). Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com