From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:40:54 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] Proposed util-linux split In-Reply-To: <20130226193330.04f77759@skate> References: <512C941A.1070207@zacarias.com.ar> <20130226193330.04f77759@skate> Message-ID: <20130226194054.0ab6cb97@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:33:30 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > I would suggest that we upgrade util-linux and add the necessary PAM > dependency when needed. We already have package/linux-pam/, so it > shouldn't be a big effort. > > Of course, only the util-linux programs that actually need PAM support > should make this library become a dependency of util-linux. I just checked, and PAM is only needed when login-utils is enabled. Also, 2.22 has apparently moved to a non-recursive usage of automake, which should make the build much, much faster. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com