From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:24:24 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] What to do about systemd/udev/eudev? In-Reply-To: <5136F5C4.6070300@mind.be> References: <1362312574-17701-1-git-send-email-olivier.schonken@gmail.com> <20130303195436.49654719@skate> <948441.33302.bm@smtp138.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <51359378.3010307@mind.be> <20130305195514.14ba14fd@skate> <5136F5C4.6070300@mind.be> Message-ID: <20130306092424.52b72106@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 08:52:36 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > Also, Olivier's patch doesn't update all the packages that depend on > > udev so that they can either depend on the old udev, or systemd. > > Yes, that's what Olivier's patch does: packages that depend on udev > will use the old udev, not the systemd udev. > > Hm, just now I realized that that means that you get two udevs when > using systemd... Yeah, yes this is what I meant by "Olivier's patch doesn't update all the packages that depend on udev so that they can either depend on the old udev, or systemd." > OK, so this is not really the way to go :-( Well, it might be the way to go, but it needs a bit more work. We can make a udev-virtual package, or whatever the name, that will depend on the old udev or systemd. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com