From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:30:09 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/6] package/genimage: new host-only package In-Reply-To: <201303110039.31451.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> References: <40cdfc7c804704b95c963d3c76852e6d2b82de31.1362693294.git.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20130310124158.65520084@skate> <201303110039.31451.yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <20130311223009.4f0dbd67@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Dear Yann E. MORIN, On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:39:31 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > I am a bit uneasy at adding licensing information for packages that are > purely host packages. > > As you said in your other mail, this might confuse a user reviewing the > licensing terms. I think this is not a good reason to not add the license. We already have it in a number of packages that have a host variant. It should be something for the licensing infrastructure to handle. > But I will add it. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com