From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:49:36 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2 of 3] oprofile: upstep 0.9.7 patches to 0.9.8 In-Reply-To: <5140DD96.3040104@mind.be> References: <41943bd3969a02bce5f9.1363111855@BEANTN0L019720> <20130313082420.0ae03777@skate> <5140DD96.3040104@mind.be> Message-ID: <20130314084936.1a16bf2f@skate> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Arnout, Thomas, On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:12:06 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > Are we already making these changes, or are we waiting for someone to > > fix the central patching code according to the new rules first? > > There is nothing to be fixed in the central patching code (at least not > for this use case). Remove the version number. Just to expand on Arnout answer: even though we haven't yet removed the support for versioned patches in the infrastructure, we have already been converting all the new packages, and many packages we were touching, to unversioned names. This will make it easier to change the package infrastructure later. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com